目前分類:未分類文章 (178)

瀏覽方式: 標題列表 簡短摘要
          愛情,它更需要的是一份努力 愛情,它更需要的是一份努力 人一生當中要經歷多少,感情,愛情,親情,友情 酒店工作,人生的情感世界,被這千情千絲編結得交錯 結婚西裝牢密,每個人都在尋找屬於,自己的幸福的終點。 兩個相愛 酒店兼職的人,不需要強調你為他做了什麼,或是他為你做了什麼,重要的是你們兩個人, 網路行銷一起做了什麼,同甘不難,重要的是共苦,當彼此互相攙扶度過劫難,那便是你們愛情當中,最美麗 褐藻醣膠的蝴蝶結。 有時候覺得,相愛的兩個人之所以會吵架,很多時候是因為生活太過於平靜安逸,但當兩個人共同面臨 代償劫難的時候,曾經讓你們喋喋不休的,牢騷都會煙消雲散。 愛,體現在生活中的點點滴滴,一份關懷,一個微笑,一個擁抱,一個?保濕面膜^眸註視,都足可以化解心中所有的怨氣,在人生最為適宜的時候,能有個人全心全意的,站在你的身邊,鼓勵你,支持你,他便成了你整個世界的支柱。 宜蘭民宿在任何事情都追求速度的今天,愛情也變了味道,相比之下,戰爭的炮火,生命的威脅更能讓一份愛情深刻,而在和平年代裡的愛,更需要的是一份關懷,體貼,理解,包容,忍 土地買賣讓.愛情需要用心去栽培,用心去灌溉,用心去呵護,從而讓人更去釋懷點什麼。 往往在人們眼裡看似,如此簡單的愛情,卻是如此複雜而縈繞…… 也許,愛情,它更需要的是一 室內設計份努力  .

en15enbaaa 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

          淡出紅塵無罣礙 淡出紅塵無罣礙 一、前言: 人生如戲亦如夢,若將戲夢弄明白。 牽 西裝牽掛掛事塵埃,看淡 酒店工作紅塵無罣礙。 以前純樸社會人心善?酒店兼職}、生活單純、快樂自在。現代文明發達,科學進步,爭 房屋買賣名好利、計較、比較,人心險惡、壓力大、身心好苦。 二、身心為何不?建築設計o清靜?貪嗔癡愛改不掉: 1、貪:貪心不足,想要的比需要的多。 2、嗔:遇到不如意的事就 代償忿忿不高興、生氣。 3、癡愛:癡心妄想,異想天開,想了入迷就是癡。 三、紅塵罣礙知多少? 1、食衣?婚禮佈置磽獢衧搕ㄢz。 2、恩怨情仇-是不透。 3、金錢情關-過不了。 4、得失成敗-看不開。 5、生離死別-淚汪汪。 開幕活動 凡塵舉月總不平,山川水秀本自然;若是有事礙心景,萬里晴天起雲煙。 四、如何淡薄紅塵罣礙? 1、視透人生真諦 2、惜緣惜福,知足感 土地買賣恩 3、藉境練心,藉凡修聖 4、隨緣無求,隨遇而安 5、歡喜承擔,輕鬆自在 五、結語: 紅塵俗事有萬千,繫繫念念皆是緣;緣聚緣散勿留戀,淡薄凡情效佛仙 買屋。  .

en15enbaaa 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

          新聞週報 Weekly Diary, No. 347 (11 – 17 April 2009) Weekly Diary, No. 347 (11 – 17 April 2009) Saturday, 18 April 2009 13:56 JUNTA BIGWHEELS HAVE NO TIME FOR WA ANNIVERSARY! CYCLONE BIJLI ON ITS WAY! CAN JUNTA HANDLE PROTESTS THE WAY THAILAND DID? “INTELLIGENT ENGAGEMENT” FOR BURMA? CartoonTips for the Senior General Think Piece Country of paradoxesThe Burmese junta recognizes that the country is a union of at least 135 distinct groups. Yet the top ranks of the military are practically devoid of any non-Burmese presence. Though Arakan sits on the country’s biggest oil and natural gas fields, Sittwe (Akyab) only gets three hours of electricity a da 小型辦公室y.Time, 30 March 2009--------------------------------------------------------------------------------The World13 April 2009UN Security Council unanimously condemns North Korea’s launch of a long range rocket on 5 April as a violation of UN ban. Six party talks at a dead end. (Reuters)--------------------------------------------------------------------------------International Relations9 April 200921 international NGOs slam “After the Storm: Voices from the Delta,” published by Johns Hopkins-Emergency Assistance Team (EAT) on 27 February as “inaccurate” and a “disservice”. 11 of them are US based seo. (Irrawaddy) 9 April 2009Kyaw Tint SweUN ambassador Kyaw Tint Swe has been replaced by Than Swe, a former deputy director in the Border Area and National Races Development Ministry. (BBC) 11 April 2009James SteinbergThe US is examining “intelligent engagement” in place of sanctions and constructive engagement, according to a senior diplomat. (Washington Post) The core target: for Burma to become “more open,” respect human rights and incorporate itself into global economy, will not change, according to Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg. But Beijing will be happy if the US can engage in Burma as a pure 情趣用品business partner. (Asia Times) 14 April 2009Aung San Suu Kyi10 out 17 women US senators urge Ban Kimoon in a letter to step up pressure on Burma’s ruling junta to scrap election plans and free Suu Kyi. (AFP) 14-15 April 2009Asean foreign ministers meet in Bali to discuss human trafficking. Burma’s police chief Khin Yi denies Rohingya are its citizens or to acknowledge that they are being persecuted. (Sydney Moring Herald/ South China Morning Post) 16 April 2009PM Thein SeinPM Thein Sein leaves for Boao, in Hainan province, to attend a 3-day forum, 17-19 April, to discuss how Asia will deal with the global financial crisis. (Xi 網路行銷nhua) 17 April 2009Zoya PhanZoya Phan, 28, daughter of the late Mahn Sha of KNU, will be launching her auto biography, “Little Daughter,” on 20 April. (Irrawaddy) 17 April 2009PM Wen JiabaoChinese PM Wen Jiabao meets his Burmese counterpart on the sidelines of the Boao forum, calling on closer cooperation in the areas of energy and transportation network as well as political stability and national reconciliation. (Xinhua)--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Thai-Burma Relations11 April 2009Red Shirts force Asean summit to be postponed. “A truly shameful day for our country,” mourns Bangkok Post. “ 酒肉朋友It is not only the government’s shame, but the whole country.” (Bangkok Post) 14 April 2009Government restores peace to streets in Bangkok. (Agencies) 16 April 2009Burmese exiles in Thailand say the way the latest crisis was handled by Bangkok was confirmation that democracy and respect for human rights are secure in the kingdom. (Irrawaddy) 16 April 2009Sondhi LimthongkulSondhi Limthongkul, co-founder of “Yellow Shirts” People’s Alliance for Democracy (PAD), narrowly escapes death when a group of heavily gunmen attempt to assassinate him. Almost 100 spent cartridges, mostly from AK 47, HK and M 16 assault rifles, recovered. (Bangkok Post) ----------- 房屋買賣---------------------------------------------------------------------Politics/ Inside Burma13 April 2009Spokesman Nyan WinNLD will be holding a nationwide meeting, 20-29 April, in Rangoon. The constitution and NLD’s future activities will be discussed, according to spokesman Nyan Win. (Mizzima)--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Shans/ Shan State17 April 2009The UWSA marks 20th anniversary of its founding in Panghsang. Bao Youxiang, its supreme leader, is clearly recovering, according to several witnesses. (SHAN) Called “20 years of Peace Building,” the event is attended by 20,000-30,000 spectators. About 2,400 UWSA fighters partic 東森房屋ipate in the military parade. On the junta side, only Col Khine Zaw, commander of Regional Operations Command based in Tangyan, and Lt-Cols Min Hein and Thein Tun Than, G1s from Lashio and Kengtung, are seen. Bao Youxiang hopes for a more prosperous and united Wa State and a peaceful settlement of disagreement with the junta. (VOA/Irrawaddy)--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Economy/ Business17 April 2009Asia Development Bank’s outlook 2009 report predicts decrease of economic growth in Burma due to weaker performances of its major partners, China, India and Thailand: Pressure on export prices of gas and agricultural products Reduced remittanc 室內設計es from migrant workers in those countries (Irrawaddy)--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Human Rights15 April 2009Antonio Guterres UN High Commissioner for Refugees Antonio Guterres says he has been given guarantee by Thai foreign minister that the Rohingya boat people will never again be towed out to sea and abandoned. (South China Morning Post)--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment16 April 2009Cyclone Bijli (01B) is moving towards the border of Burma and Bangladesh. At the time of landfall on 18 April, the winds could sustain 75 mph (120 kmph). (Accuweather.com) 17 April 2009Cyclone Bijli hits Bangladesh, pac 591king winds of 55 mph (90kmph). (AP) 17 April 2009Weather officials issue cyclone warning, urging residents in the western coastal to stay away from the sea until the storm passes. Tidal surges 6-8ft high are expected, says radio report, which puts the threat at orange, a medium level. The wind speed could reach 60-75 mph. (AFP)--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Drugs--------------------------------------------------------------------------------War15 April 2009 KNLA base camp of 201st Battalion attacked by joint Burma Army-DKBA force. (Mizzima) http://www.shanland.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2535:weekly-diary-no-347-11--17-april-2009-&catid=weekly-diary&It 膠原蛋白emid=271  .

en15enbaaa 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

          Burma Re-establishes Diplomatic Ties with North Korea A Bridge Not Too Far !天下無難事,只怕有心人! Burma Re-establishes Diplomatic Ties with North KoreaBy The Associated Press/Rangoon, BurmaApril 26, 2007 Burma and North Korea, two 小額信貸of Asia's most repressive regimes, signed an agreement Thursday to resume diplomatic ties during a visit to Burma by the North Korean vice foreign minister, an official sa 酒店打工id. North Korean Vice Foreign Minister Kim Yong Il Burma severed diplomatic relations with North Korea in 1983, following a fatal bombing blamed on North Korean commandos during a visit to Y 室內設計angon by former South Korean President Chun Doo-hwan. The two countries have been quietly working to normalize relations for the past few years. The two governments routinely meet at regional meetings, and B 關鍵字廣告urma has reportedly bought weapons from North Korea. Burma's deputy foreign minister, Kyaw Thu, told reporters the agreement to restore ties was signed Thursday morning on the second day of the three-day visit by Nort 關鍵字行銷h Korean Vice Foreign Minister Kim Yong Il, whose trip had been cloaked in secrecy. It is now up to Pyongyang whether it will open diplomatic offices in Burma, Kyaw Thu said. China, which shares borders with the two countries and has clos 租屋網e trade and economic ties with both regimes, welcomed the reconciliation. "North Korea and Burma are both friendly neighbors of China," said Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Liu Jianchao. "We are happy to see and welcome the improvement of their bilate 烤肉食材ral ties." Both Burma and North Korea have been widely criticized for their authoritarian governments, with Burma drawing censure especially for its detention of political opponents, including Nobel peace prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi. North Korea has drawn internatio 室內裝潢nal condemnation for its refusal to abandon its nuclear weapons program. In 2005, US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice listed Burma and North Korea as among the six countries that were "outposts of tyranny." In the 1983 bombing in Rangoon, the South Korean president was unhurt, but 21 peo 西服ple were killed, including four South Korean Cabinet ministers. Three North Korean commandos involved in the bombing were detained—one was hung, a second blew himself up during his arrest and a third, Kang Ming Chul, remains in Rangoon's Insein prison. http://www.irrawaddy.org/aviewer.asp?a=7003&z=16 酒店兼職3  .

en15enbaaa 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

          (轉貼)天蠍座終極完美分析   一是欺騙,這種欺騙也許不是很大,也許發生在很好的朋友甚至親友之間,也許只是一樁小事,但蠍子看來,重要的不是欺騙造成了什麼損失,而是欺騙這種行為本身,他認為這是強烈的不信任感,是對他的不尊重。一個小小的欺騙在蠍子的心中會激盪起巨大的不快,天性陰冷的蠍子習慣將它放大來看,也可以說這種與他們處事風格準則背道而弛的行為是他們輕蔑並?酒店打工葵滿C用欺騙傷害蠍子產生的裂痕一般是不容易消除的。當事人在蠍子心中的地位可以說馬上會大幅下降。經觀察,沒有哪個星座的人像蠍子這樣如此深地看重信任和尊重這兩個詞,他們一般對此都很敏感。敏感得容下不在他許可的小小範圍內出現一粒沙。越是親密關係間的欺騙對蠍子的傷害就越大。因為他們對朋友往往 小額信貸交出真心,而這種付出償來的若是欺騙和背叛的話,蠍子的心會冷到極點。 二是侮辱。敏感的蠍子其實並不那麼開得起玩笑,當然他們能敏銳地分辨出你話裡的真實含義,善意的玩笑他們還是不會拒絕的。但帶刺的話他們絕對能馬上聽出,他能感受到你語氣中的真實的感情成分。很自我的蠍子絕對不容忍別人侮辱他貶低他。也許一件事情讓 租屋他糟糕,讓他吃虧很大,但如果需要的話他能壓抑住自己的情緒,裝作若無其事。惟獨侮辱不可以,你可以感受到蠍子那一刻表情越發陰冷,牙關緊閉。那是他在積蘊力量,你能感受得到他強壓怒火的眼神,開始起伏的胸膛,只需要一個小小突破口,巨大的能量就要噴薄而出。這個時候,瞭解他們的人還是趕緊收口吧,否則誰都不知道會發生什麼可怕的事情。我自己 房屋貸款就經歷過多次這樣的情景,從來都是是猛烈的瞬間爆發,不明白的人奇怪怎麼突然發這麼大脾氣,其實真實情況是,他忍著氣已經很久很久了,只是你硬逼他爆發的。  三是為了他認為重要的人。蠍子是活得孤獨的人,他們自己都會發現,自己和許多人是格格不入的,他滿臉的笑容很多時候都不是發自內心的,只是為了場合的需要,真正談得來並懂得他們的朋友一般很少很少。 買屋 生命中他重視的人他一定會傾力保護,蠍子為了保護那個人時,顯現出的感情是強大的。這個人最大的可能就是曾在蠍子需要時給過真正理解溫暖關愛的人。哪怕是一點點。像會記恨一樣,蠍子對那些對他真心好的人絕對是記在心上的,沒有太多的表面的東西,關鍵的時候,真正肯為你犧牲的那個朋友,肯定是他。 對他最愛的那個人而言,蠍子有可能的話甚至肯為她去死。如果他心中的那個她 景觀設計被別人傷害的話,蠍子會有剜心的痛,這個時候,他可能會暴露出最陰暗的一面,如果要把報復和蠍子聯繫起來的話,那麼這種情況當屬第一。蠍子這時候可能會在巨痛的驅使下,用最黑暗的力量為她去復仇去摧毀敵人。在我看來,蠍子最最強烈感情表現出來的時候,應該就是他為了保護她的時候。水象之王的蠍子外表看來往往不那麼強硬,甚至有點軟弱,這是很多人對他們的印象,但瞭解他們的內心的人就會發現,他 烏來溫泉們是討厭被指使的人。 可以說,蠍子是吃軟不吃硬的,平等對他的話,他便是個性子很好的人,要是想壓制他,蠍子內心馬上會排斥,並且潛意識裡他們是很厭惡習慣對他們指手畫腳的人的。他們心中多數是不服,但不會明顯表現出來,也許暫時地順著對方,背後則默默積累力量,也許乾脆用冷漠直接表示拒絕和厭惡。蠍子確實是喜歡掌控別人的人,但不像火象的獅子那種氣焰上統領一切的感覺,蠍子能用一種獨特的暗藏的力量影 買屋響人,因為他有著洞穿別人內心的敏銳力和堅定沉靜的氣質。如果蠍子具備一些火象性格的話,則會是個讓人感覺非常凌厲的人,冷靜的外表下說起話做起事來霸氣十足。蠍子如果學著性格張揚一點的話,會馬上顯現出強大的領導力。  蠍子對自己的愛人也有著強烈的掌控欲,只有當那個她只對他一個人好的時候,他才感覺安心,他希望她能常陪在他身邊,希望她能經常依靠他,所以小鳥依人般的溫柔甜蜜的女孩子最能激起蠍子愛的感覺。這就解釋了為 新成屋什麼他和水象的魚兒和巨蟹很和得來的原因。 蠍子比較喜歡不帶表情的說話做事,可以說,蠍子很難學會用表情表達他們豐富的內心世界,他們是不善於利用表情的人。   蠍子本質是不愛笑的,尤其不習慣在一大堆人之間肆無忌憚地笑,蠍子習慣淺淺地一笑,讓他們在眾人面前表情誇張地保持10秒鐘我相信是件困難的事情。 .msgcontent .wsharing ul li { text-indent: 0; } 分享 Facebook Plurk YAHOO! 酒店工作  .

en15enbaaa 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

          中國與英國核武戰略及態勢比較 Chapter 1 Introduction ___________________________________________________________________ Historically, attention has mainly centred on nuclear strategies and force postures of the two Cold War Superpowers, which have possessed the largest nuclear inventories in the world. The attention paid to other nuclear weapons states,[1] by comparison, has been relatively limited. More seriously, there is a dearth of research, which has satisfactorily ventured into the realm of comparative studies of nuclear strategies between medium-size nuclear powers. In view of this, this comparative study of British and Chinese nuclear strategies and force postures aims not only comprehensively to revisit the evolution of nuclear strategies of both countries, but also analytically to compare Western and Eastern nuclear force postures that in many ways are so different. The substance of nuclear strategy is so complicated that even the most detailed dictionary of military terms fails to list its definition.[2] In order to properly explore the essence of British and Chinese nuclear strategies and force postures, this book will provide four indispensable aspects as discussion forums for the two cases under review. In addition to the Introduction and the Conclusions, this book comprises four major parts: Evolution of Strategic Nuclear Weapons, Strategic Doctrines, Special Nuclear Relationships, and Command, Control and Operations. In Chapter Two, evolution of British and Chinese strategic nuclear systems, which physically constitute their nuclear assets, is discussed. The adoption of major nuclear systems reflects not only the strategic preference for chosen systems, but also the capacities by which a state materialises its resources into nuclear strength. Under a comparative framework, Chapter Two contrasts two different paths of development, as well as the strategic and financial concerns of each case. After discussing the hardware of nuclear forces, Chapter Three deals with the software part, strategic doctrines, which provide the intellectual, political and military guidance for nuclear decision-makers. Unsurprisingly, Britain and China did not share much in terms of nuclear doctrines and policies although sometimes they were placed in similar circumstances. Relations with the Superpowers, influenced by diverse variables, are examined in Chapter Four. Such relations, which present a political and diplomatic dimension of nuclear strategy, are unique and complicated, but without comparative scrutiny, further understanding cannot be achieved. The last, but definitely not least important topic, which covers nuclear command, control, targeting and operations, is left to Chapter Five. These issues, which are more or less military-oriented, contain practical schemes for achieving nuclear strategic and tactical objectives. Examining these subjects is helpful not only to unfold the strategic priorities a nuclear weapons state has set, but also to assess the credibility of the existing or underlying strategic doctrines it has declared. This book aims to provide a comprehensive comparison of the two cases under review. Individually, each chapter represents a study of a particular issue based on available literature, together with critical analysis and evaluation. Collectively, this arrangement attempts to c 膠原蛋白over as many influential factors as possible in order systematically to compare the two different medium size nuclear powers. These tasks are challenging, but by no means a mission impossible. I have no intention to rewrite the history radically, but it is my hope that this book can bridge the gap in the current understanding of the both cases by a new comparative approach. Chapter 2 Evolution of Strategic Nuclear Weapons ___________________________________________________________________ An examination of the evolution of strategic nuclear weapons is an indispensable approach to analyse how a state transforms its nuclear potential into real strength. In this chapter, the major focus will be placed on a historical investigation as well as an analytical comparison of strategic nuclear weapons developments in Britain and China. Tactical nuclear weapons will be mentioned, but more concisely. This chapter is not intended to provide exhaustive descriptions on both cases because the function of this chapter is to serve as background knowledge to understand nuclear strategies and force postures of Britain and China. It is not designed to compile all existing data. 2-1 Britain 2-1-1 V-bombers The development of nuclear weapons in Britain, as one of the Big Three, could be traced back as early as the early 1940s. According the 1941 MAUD report, the atomic bomb was technically feasible and could be ready by the end of 1943 at an estimated cost of £5 million.[3] Nonetheless, Britain’s indigenous efforts to build atomic bombs were frustrated due to the course of the war. The UK eventually decided to cooperate with the Americans, and the British scientists made significant contributions to the final success of the Manhattan Project. After WWII, as a result of the shift of the American policy and passage of the McMahon Act of 1946, the British-American interaction and sharing on atomic energy, and most importantly, nuclear weapons, were temporarily suspended. Without American assistance, the British still decided to go alone for their own bombs.[4] After years of endeavour, at Monte Bello, Australia on 3 October 1952, Britain exploded its first atomic device,[5] and officially became the third member of the nuclear club. The British acquired thermonuclear technology,[6] and after something of a false start in the only partially successful tests in May 1957 on Malden Island,[7] they successfully exploded their first prototype megaton range H-bomb in November of that year in the Grapple-X trials near Christmas Island. In April 1958, the British exploded the Grapple-Y device of 3-megaton, the highest yield of all the British test devices. After completing the Grapple-Z trials in September 1958, the British had the ability of making the invulnerable (or immune) 1-ton/1-megaton nuclear weapon, which was viewed as the ultimate objective of the four Grapple series.[8] To obtain a credible nuclear deterrent, the delivery systems are as important as, if not more so than, the bomb itself. To select the first generation strategic delivery system did not encounter too much difficulty in Whitehall. The initial nuclear posture of the UK was reflected by its preference for air power. Similar to the US 商務中心 Strategic Air Command (SAC), in Britain, Bomber Command and its incoming V-bombers naturally assumed the core deterrent task in the 1950s,[9] and unsurprisingly, the RAF was granted the lion’s share of the defence budget.[10] As early as July 1946, the Cabinet Defence Committee had given high priority to the development of long range bombers and the Air Staff put out a requirement on 1 January 1947 for aircraft two or three times more effective than contemporary bombers in altitude, speed and range. In view of the technological improvement, it was anticipated that both Britain’s first bomb and delivery systems would be available in the mid-1950s.[11] The so-called V-bombers comprised three different models: Valiant, Victor, and Vulcan. To meet the Air Staff requirements for advanced bombers, proposals were submitted by Vickers, Handley Page and Avro and were examined in detail. All three appeared to be excellent designs and met the required operational specifications. The Air Council, led by Air Chief Marshal Sir John Slessor as Chief of the Air Staff, decided to order all three types. Vickers’ design, Valiant, was to be produced first on high priority as an interim aircraft in place of the less sophisticated Sperrin; the other two were to follow as quickly as possible. Avro’s proposal, Vulcan, was a more advanced design for a high-performance four-engine jet bomber, incorporating a delta-wing structure and other new features. Its range and load carrying capacity were far greater than anything previously operated by the RAF in any role. Handley Page’s Victor was no less impressive. This was a crescent-wing concept, not previously used in any bomber design, and its performance also met Air Staff requirements.[12] In November 1953, the first production warheads, Blue Danube, based on the test device exploded in the previous year, were issued to the military although at that time, the RAF had no aircraft immediately capable of carrying them,[13] and Britain’s deterrence still required the US strategic air power.[14] The first squadron of the V-bombers was introduced in 1955.[15] In the next year, Britain obtained an operational nuclear capacity with Valiant and Blue Danube. The yield of these production weapons was limited to 10 kilotons (a little less than the Hiroshima bomb) in order to economise on fissile material for providing more weapons.[16] Later, higher yield American bombs were provided to the RAF via Project E, but they were under the strict US control and custodianship. With the V-bombers as a major deterrent, other weapons systems were introduced in Britain during the late 1950s. An Anglo-American agreement was negotiated in 1957-58, which allowed the US to base 60 Thor intermediate-range ballistic missile (IRBM), a liquid-fuelled system with a range of 2,800 kilometres (1,500 nautical miles) and a full megaton range thermonuclear warhead in eastern England. The Thor missiles, which were deployed in unhardened sites and had a slow reaction time, were operated by Bomber Command on a “dual key” basis, whereby American and British authorisation was required before missiles could be launched. Thor was operational from 1960 to early 1963. While it made a significant numerical contribution to Britain’s strategic deterrence, nevertheless, there were always doubts 會場佈置about its utility as a second strike force, and the likelihood of inviting a pre-emptive strike, at grave danger to British territory.[17] The beginning of the 1960s marked the decline of Bomber Command. Its budget shrank from 10 per cent of the defence expenditure in the 1950s to 2-4 per cent.[18] It was thought that the attrition rate of the V-bombers would be dangerously high: a possibility of 70-90 per cent loss as the Soviet air defence systems improved.[19] The V-force reached its highest numerical strength at the beginning of the 1960s with a maximum front line of 180.[20] Members of the V-bombers family were fitted to carry the full range of British free-fall weapons, including Blue Danube, Red Beard, Violet Club, Yellow Sun MKI, Yellow Sun MKII, the WE177s as well as the stand-off rocket Blue Steel.[21] In 1968, Bomber Command was abolished and incorporated into Strike Command. In the wake of the reorganisation and the loss of “strategic” nuclear function to the RN in 1969, the RAF hoped to maintain an air delivered capability for as long as possible.[22] The remaining WE177-equipped Vulcan bombers were assigned to Supreme Allied Commander in Europe (SACEUR).[23] The RAF managed to retain a theatre (later “sub-strategic”) nuclear role beyond 1982 with the WE177s, both low and high yields, carried by Jaguar and Tornado.[24] After the official retirement of the WE177 on 31 March 1998, the RAF no longer possessed nuclear weapons. 2-1-2 Polaris Although before the relaxation of the McMahon Act, the British had only limited access to US knowledge of nuclear weapons, the RN was aware of the existence of the ongoing Polaris sea-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) system from its inception.[25] Foreseeing the budgetary difficulty but encouraged by the Americans,[26] First Sea Lord Mountbatten knew that it would not be easy to sell Polaris at home, especially as the Government in 1956 had announced the development of Blue Streak, a liquid-fuelled IRBM, on which work had begun as early as 1953.[27] As the Soviet missiles improved, Blue Streak was undermined as a credible deterrent system. Firstly, Blue Streak, closely related to the US Atlas ballistic missile,[28] would have to be placed in hardened underground silos built at high costs, which were far over what the Treasury was willing to pay.[29] Secondly, the liquid-fuelled Blue Streak missiles would need 10-15 minutes to prepare for launching. The long reaction time would make Britain defenceless against pre-emptive strikes by the Soviet ballistic missiles. Thirdly, installing fixed-site rockets near the large centres of populations would cause public anxiety. Worries about countervalue attacks strengthened the opposition for Blue Streak.[30] Finally, due to the departure of powerful supporters such as Duncan Sandys and Sir Frederick Brundrett, the Chief Scientist, the Blue Streak project became less viable than ever. On 24 February 1960, the Defence Committee of the Cabinet reached a decision to cancel Blue Streak. The option of Polaris soon emerged, although at that time, many people in the RN preferred to leave the deterrent role to the RAF. In the meanwhile, there were also other competitors under consideration, such as America’s Skybolt, extensively lobbied for by the Air Ministry. Skybolt, initially as solution 酒店經紀 to the OR 1159 requirement (Blue Steel MK2), was an air-launched ballistic missile (ALBM) that could be fitted to the V-bombers as a successor to Blue Steel. With a minimum range of 1,850 kilometres (1,000 nautical miles),[31] Skybolt offered a high chance of penetrating Soviet defences, but combining a ballistic missile with a high speed launch platform posed significant problems. Its efficacy beyond the mid-1960s was also in doubt. Nevertheless, a Skybolt technical agreement was signed on 23 September 1960 between London and Washington, and in exchange, the British offered the Americans a base in Holy Loch for the Atlantic Polaris submarine force. The US, however, cancelled Skybolt in December 1962. In spite of previous signs of cancellation, Macmillan and his colleagues were left feeling helpless. Although the RAF asked if Skybolt was delayed or cancelled, a ram-jet-powered cruise missile Pandora be procured in its place, Defence Minister Harold Watkinson had concluded that the Government would purchase Polaris instead.[32] The ALBM was therefore out of contention. With the cancellation of Skybolt, as the main candidate for Britain’s future nuclear deterrent, Polaris itself still faced a series of difficulties. The first was undoubtedly the budgetary concern. It was estimated that Polaris would cost at least 3 per cent of annual defence budget (£60 million) over 20 years.[33] Although this could be lower than the whole V-bomber projects, no service, especially the RN, would expect the deterrent money be spent completely from its own pocket. Unable to seek extra money from the Treasury to fund Polaris, Defence Minister Peter Thorneycroft decided the three services should evenly share the expenses as “deterrent budget”.[34] The second difficulty was the domestic opposition within the US. In mid-1956, when the British expressed their interest in nuclear-powered submarines, it was Rear Admiral Hyman G. Rickover, the founding father of the US nuclear-powered submarines, who adamantly opposed sharing information on propulsion reactors and submarine designs, although he was later persuaded by Lord Mountbatten to agree to this transfer.[35] As for the advanced SLBM, many US officials could feel the urgent need of the British for a nuclear deterrent competent for a new generation, but were concerned that such an agreement would impair their developing relations with the French. The overly close Anglo-American relations and more independent British nuclear force would not help Washington’s political and military arrangements in Europe. Under pressure, the John F. Kennedy Administration offered the British the Hound Dog, another air-launched system instead of Polaris. It was Prime Minister Macmillan, who used his personal influence to let President Kennedy know the political consequence to his Government and himself if the Polaris sale could not be concluded. Fortunately, personal friendship in time prevailed. At Nassau, Bahamas during 18-21 December 1962, the Polaris SLBM transfer to Britain was officially decided. London would procure Polaris missiles from Washington for four submarines, with the reservation for the fifth.[36] In return, the Americans asked the British to assign their Polaris force to SACEUR, but Britain reserved its right to withdraw. Targets were to be allocated by the Joint Strateg 節能燈具ic Nuclear Targeting Staff in Omaha, Nebraska. The lease of the Holy Loch base to the US was also viewed as part of the Nassau agreement. Despite those strings attached, in the eyes of Macmillan, the possession of Polaris would still be an explicit symbol of independence. The final agreement was signed by US Secretary of State Dean Rusk and the British Ambassador David Ormsby-Gore on 6 April 1963. The British seemed to have procured 99 missiles, comprising rocket motors and ancillary equipment, in the first instance.[37] The warhead itself, made in Britain was a version of the high yield WE177 with a physically much smaller primary. Each warhead had an explosive power of 200 kilotons. It was estimated about 150 warheads were produced.[38] The missiles were to be maintained and stored at the Royal Naval Armament Depot (RNAD) at Coulport. They would not be in the submarine during the refit and docking period at Rosyth, and would not be handled either there or at the operating base.[39] The nuclear powered ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs), Britain’s largest submarines at that time, were built in Britain with a displacement of 7,500 tons surfaced, 8,400 tons dived, almost twice as large as HMS Dreadnought, Britain’s first nuclear-powered submarine (SSN). According to Eric Grove, the reactor section, similar to that of HMS Valiant, was grafted on to the US designed missile compartment, which had been manufactured by the UK, building a new forward section to house both the forward torpedo tubes and sonar equipment.[40] Each boat could carry a maximum of 16 Polaris missiles with range of 4,600 kilometres (2,500 nautical miles).[41] Orders were placed for the first two submarines Resolution and Repulse from the lead yard, Vickers-Armstrong in Barrow-in-Furness, whilst Renown and Revenge were built at Birkenhead by Camell-Laird.[42] HMS Resolution was launched on 15 September 1966. She was commissioned on 2 October 1967. By the following October, Resolution began her first operational patrol. HMS Repulse was commissioned at the same time in 1968.[43] Two months later, HMS Renown was commissioned. HMS Revenge was completed in December 1969.[44] Six months previously, Polaris boats had officially taken over the nuclear deterrent role from the V-bombers. At least one Polaris submarine would always be on patrol. The Polaris era had begun. For Britain, the Polaris transfer was deemed as a very cost-effective option and lived up to many expectations. Not only did Polaris come earlier than anticipated, but also the British obtained it on extraordinarily inexpensive terms. On a pro rata basis, Britain’s five planned submarines to America’s forty-one, the British only might have to pay 12 per cent of the R&D expenses. In a later agreement, President Kennedy allowed Britain to pay a surcharge of 5 per cent on the final production price of the A-3 missile as a contribution to the massive R&D expenses. Such a favour saved the British a huge expenditure of at least £1 billion.[45] Nevertheless, Polaris, advanced as it was, had difficulty in meeting the operational requirements the British needed.[46] As early as 1960, Polaris had been criticised in Parliament as “a crude weapon with a huge margin of error”.[47] Although the Polaris missiles had multiple re-entry vehicles (MRVs), they could not place these vehicles indepe 房屋買賣ndently over several separate targets, i. e., were not MIRVed. This meant that each missile, even if it carried a cluster of warheads and decoys, could only attack the area of a single large target, rather than a number of separate targets. As Moscow’s anti-ballistic missile (ABM) system developed,[48] there were doubts about its capacity to meet the so-called “Moscow Criterion”. In view of the obsolescence of Polaris, the UK Government for a time considered the MIRVed US Poseidon missile system, which was highly recommended by the Americans. Yet, Poseidon delivered a smaller yield (50 kilotons) than Polaris and produced no significant improvement in terms of range (4,600 kilometres). In addition, Poseidon had been in service since 1971 and would possibly be phased out by the US Navy at the same time as it could be entering operational service with the RN. This would cause a tremendous problem for the British to cooperate with the Americans on logistic and war-planning matters. After assessment and despite much opposition from the RN, the Wilson Government determined to give up the Poseidon option in June 1967,[49] although there was little technological difficulty to Poseidonise the British Polaris fleet.[50] In the late 1960s, the British decided to open a Polaris warhead improvement programme. Studies of Chevaline (a.k.a. “Super Antelope” or “KH793”) were made in 1967 and the decision to proceed was made by the first Wilson Government that same year.[51] The Chevaline concept was defined in 1969 and the system had been worked out in detail in 1972. By incorporating the latest American advances in weight reduction and warhead hardening, it has been said that Britain “probably succeeded in jumping a generation of warhead development.”[52] It was approved for deployment by the Heath Government, and a decision finally ratified by the second Wilson Government in February 1974. The first Chevaline warhead, designated the TK-100, was tested on 23 May 1974, but it was not until 24 January 1980 that the existence of Chevaline was known to the public.[53] The major improvements of Chevaline included: (1) advanced penetration aids and the ability to manoeuvre part of the payload in space; (2) the ability to change course, angle of re-entry into the atmosphere and the speed of descent so as to confuse the enemy; (3) early separation before arriving within the defence range; (4) the inclusion in the re-entry package of a number of decoys with the same features as the genuine articles; and (5) hardening to protect the internal electronics from the impacts of nuclear explosion.[54] Production of the Chevaline warhead ran from the late 1970s to mid-1980s with about 100 warheads being produced.[55] Sea trials of Chevaline were conducted in November 1980. Chevaline went on patrol for the first time in mid-1982 aboard HMS Renown, with deployment completed in 1987.[56] The estimated yield of each Chevaline warhead was 225 kilotons.[57] Each would fly a different trajectory so that all warheads would arrive simultaneously over the target. There were two real warheads (reduced from the three of the Polaris A-3) inside balloons that were indistinguishable from numerous balloon decoys.[58] The system was highly effective, if expensive to develop. 2-1-3 Trident With US progress in technology, the destructive and penetrative capacities o 酒店經紀f the Polaris SLBM were outshone by America’s new military innovations, despite Britain’s Chevaline upgrading programme. Continued supplies of the missiles were also becoming doubtful. With the US withdrawing its last remaining Polaris submarine from service in 1982, Lockheed, the sole manufacturer of the missiles, would feel no need to keep its production line open simply for its British clients.[59] In that case, the UK would have to rely on stocked missiles whose solid-fuels were to expire after about 10 years of preservation, and the rocket motors, fire control mechanism, and electronic components would be subject to wear and tear.[60] In addition to the missiles, the submarines had their own problems. The original estimate of the operational life of the Polaris boats was 20 years, and on that basis, they would need to be replaced around 1990.[61] Maintenance of older boats would be more expensive and time-consuming. Older hulls were inevitably noisier, both in absolute terms as they aged, and relative to new designs. This would reduce the operational flexibility and strategic value of the Polaris fleet. When James Callaghan succeeded Harold Wilson as Prime Minister in 1976, his Government faced the issue of deciding on a successor to Polaris. In January 1978, Callaghan commissioned studies for the options for replacing Polaris. A small informal group of ministers was set up and its very existence was kept from the rest of the Cabinet. The group, consisting of Callaghan, Foreign Minister David Owen, Chancellor Denis Healey, and Defence Minister Fred Mulley quickly determined that a new system should be acquired, although it was not decided whether this would be Trident. Although at that time the overall international situation was different from that in the early 1960s when the Polaris procurement had been negotiated, the domestic debates for its successor were no less fierce. For example, former Foreign Minister David Owen regarded the Moscow Criterion as a misguided Whitehall orthodoxy, and believed that Polaris submarines could be made to last long after their end-of-life in 1993. Running them on would ensure that full value was obtained for the money the Government had agreed to spend on Chevaline, which then was still years away from entering service. In terms of the Polaris successor, if required, Owen, with the support of Lord Zuckerman, subscribed to the cruise missile alternative.[62] According to these proponents, the cruise missile could provide tactics of multiplication and dispersion. Better, cruise missiles could be easily adapted by existing aircraft and could be launched from submarines, either from dedicated launchers or from torpedo tubes.[63] The MoD, however, favoured the Trident ballistic missile system rather than cruise missiles.[64] It argued that cruise missiles were slow (sub-sonic) and too vulnerable for the core strategic role. The MoD also believed that cruise missiles might be cheaper than ballistic missiles individually, but to procure a working cruise missile force, which could be comparable to Polaris, not to mention a Trident flotilla, would require more missiles and accordingly more launch platforms.[65] Apart from cruise missiles, there were proposals for British-made ballistic missiles to replace Polaris. Thanks to the Chevaline experience, however, the possibility of developing a British missile wa 房地產s discounted. Britain could hardly afford the combination of cost, time-scale and technical risk.[66] The idea of modifying Polaris boats was also submitted. It was argued that the US had converted 12 of its Lafayette class submarines, originally carrying Polaris, to accommodate Trident. There was no reason why the British Resolution class submarines could not be converted to do so.[67] Supporters were convinced that although the costs of modification would rise disproportionately with the life of system, it could overall be much cheaper than procuring Trident.[68] However, the problem of modification was that this option would only be viable if Polaris could continue to serve as an effective deterrent beyond 2010. That was also a risky strategy, which the Government was not prepared to accept.[69] The Conservative victory in May 1979 brought back to office a Government committed to the future of deterrence. To examine a replacement for Polaris/Chevaline, Margaret Thatcher established a Cabinet Committee, MISC 7.[70] This Committee comprised Thatcher herself, Defence Minister Francis Pym, Foreign Minister Lord Carrington, Chancellor Sir Geoffrey Howe and Home Secretary Willie Whitelaw. On 6 December 1979, a formal decision was made by MISC 7 to procure the Trident C-4 system, minus the warheads and submarines which would be built in the UK.[71] When the decision for Trident had been made, the rest would be left for negotiations with the Americans. Unlike the Polaris transfer, the Trident deal was much easier to make. After years of cooperation, the US had little doubt on Britain’s idea of an “independent nuclear deterrent”. A refusal to sell Trident would simply alienate the British. Meanwhile, a promotion of Britain’s nuclear capabilities would be positive for the West-East strategic balance. When the Soviet Union had been planning to deploy the new SS-20 missiles in Europe,[72] Britain’s Trident could help to penetrate the Soviet ABM defences and to deliver reliable strikes on Moscow, if needed. On 15 July 1980, the UK Government released the texts of letters exchanged between Prime Minster Thatcher and President Jimmy Carter confirming that Britain would purchase the Trident C-4 missile for a force of British-built SSBNs to replace the Polaris fleet. The missiles, together with equipment and supporting services, would be supplied on a similar basis to Polaris.[73] This meant that Britain only had to pay 5 per cent of the R&D costs and was also expected to provide the air defence for American bases in Britain.[74] The Thatcher Government stressed that the Trident decision was one that was commensurate with a policy extending back over 40 years, and had been embraced by both the Conservative and Labour parties.[75] By October 1981, a new problem emerged. New US President Ronald Reagan came to office on a platform that included a rapid increase in American military power. An important element of this ambition was to be the early replacement of the Trident C-4 missile with a new D-5 version, which was a generation ahead of the C-4 and two generations ahead of Polaris. Such a change would obviously affect the previous transfer to Britain. This time, the full cabinet was involved in the change to buy the Trident D-5, although they had little choice but to agree. Even so, the decision of switching to the D-5 missile was soon well justified by the MoD by t 買屋he following reasons. (1)The D-5 system would be an evolutionary development, which was significantly larger than the C-4 and would be able either to carry the same payload a much greater distance and with greater accuracy or to carry its maximum payload over approximately the same range as the C-4.[76] (2)The US Navy, which first deployed the C-4 system in 1980, would likely withdraw its last C-4 missiles from service before the introduction of Britain’s forces. The UK might thus become the sole operator of the C-4 and this would give rise to a number of logistic, operational and financial penalties. If Britain adopted the D-5 rather the C-4, it could be expected to retain commonality with the US systems throughout its projected service life.[77] (3) The D-5 missile would provide flexibility to cope with possible improvement of the Soviet anti-ballistic missile defence throughout its service life.[78] (4) The additional capital cost of adopting the D-5 was assessed at September 1980 price as only some £390 million, or about 7 per cent increase of the total programme. It was a financially acceptable option.[79] As far as the submarines were concerned, the Vickers Shipyard and Engineering Ltd. was the primary contractor. The contract for the first British Trident submarine, Vanguard, was signed in April 1986. Vanguard, 15,900 tons dived, had twice the displacement of its predecessor, but a slightly smaller crew, at 132 compared to 149.[80] Like the Polaris submarines, its homeport would be located at Faslane, on the shore of Gare Loch, Strathclyde, Scotland. Vanguard would be armed with up to 16 12,000-kilometre range MIRVed missiles, less than 24 in the US’s Ohio.[81] The missiles would be stored and refurbished in King’s Bay, Georgia by the Americans. The first batch of British Trident warheads were completed in September 1992. They were designed by the Atomic Weapons Research Establishment (AWRE) at Aldermaston, and were assembled at Aldermaston and Burghfield.[82] The warheads were thought to “Anglicise” the US W76, with perhaps the inclusion of some features from the US W88.[83] Warhead production continued into 1999, which was probably its last year of production. The Trident warheads were mated to the missiles on-board the submarine by RNAD at Coulport, eight miles from Faslane. HMS Vanguard took to the water on 5 May 1992. Twenty days later, the first Polaris boat, HMS Resolution retired.[84] On 14 August 1993, HMS Vanguard entered service. In 1995, 1996 and 1999, the other three boats, HMS Victorious, HMS Vigilant and HMS Vengeance respectively joined the RN.[85] The Vanguards were planned to remain in service until at least 2020. In the light of the Polaris precedent, the Naval Staff asked for the cost of Trident to be spread equally over the three services. This request, however, was rejected by Defence Minister John Nott because he thought Trident as a single-service responsibility.[86] Table 2-1. Comparison of the US and UK SLBMs SLBM First Deployed Range CEP (m) Max. yields ; Warhead; US Polaris A-3 1964 2,500nm/4,600km 900 3 × 200 kt (MRV) US Poseidon C-3 1971 2,500nm/4,600km 450 10 × 50 kt (MIRV) or 14 RV over reduced range (W76) US Trident C-4 .msgcontent .wsharing ul li { text-indent: 0; } 分享 Facebook Plurk YAHOO! 賣屋  .

en15enbaaa 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

          驊訊轉投資iPeer獲港商入股 【呂俊儀/台北報導】工商時報2008.03.29 驊訊(6237)轉投資iPeer集團?太平洋房屋A昨日宣布獲港商Plampay(香港掛牌 支票貼現公司,代號8047)入股,投資金額約二五○萬美元,驊訊表?資產管理公司隉APlampay主要看好iPeer集團結合線上音樂硬體及軟體競爭力及華人音樂市 當鋪場商機,由於Plampay於中國大陸建立小額付款商業平台,順利解決iPeer在當地收款機制,雙方結?訂做禮服X有助搶攻全球華人音樂市場。 驊訊指出,iPeer集團去年底與夏新推出卡拉OK手機熱銷後,iPeer集團為持 室內裝潢續拓展大陸手機市場,進一步整合硬體產品競爭力,導入客戶手機平台。根據調查,去年中國大陸手機市場手機用戶約達五?酒店工作D四八億戶,其中二.一億戶已開始使用線上下載功能,另一.八億戶則對手機下載音樂功能極有興趣。 驊訊認為,由於iPeer擁有完整線上 買屋音樂正版服務平台,兩岸手機客戶及營運商可享受一次購足便利性及掌握市場商機時效性,因而獲Plampay公司青睞,而Plampay提供多元化支付平台服務,兩家公司緊密合 太平洋房屋作後,未來也將推出多項產品及解決方案。 .msgcontent .wsharing ul li { text-indent: 0; } 分享 Facebook Plurk YAHOO! 農地貸款  .

en15enbaaa 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

          大型股超跌 低接等反彈 蘋果日報 自營商操盤人日記台股昨天再度受美股重挫影響,直接跌破年線8465點,並回補8307點跳空缺口支撐。雖然昨日部分IC設計股表現抗跌,但近?買屋網螫j勢股無法續強,導致法人不敢追價,例如,揚智(3041)利空是否出盡、與聯陽(3014)、偉詮電(2436) 西裝外套是否續強都是未來觀察的重點,以盤勢跌深之後,短線應有反彈行情,但國際股市能否續強仍是指標。 搶反彈先看美股臉色 帛琉 由於大盤還處於築底階段,一般來說,大盤會反覆測底,因此實際操作容易被盤勢誤導,投資人短線操作難度高,由於盤勢多空反轉速度太過戲劇 買屋性,讓法人及投資人無所適從,且外資連日大賣使台股無法招架,外資賣超主要在於美股弱勢,現階段台股能否醞釀反彈力道,仍得看美股臉色,對於心臟不夠強的?G2000賳磥H,最好先靜待買點,別急著搶進。以技術面來分析,以台股本波下跌以來,跌幅已達1517點,已滿足要求,從技術面來看具有反彈行情,甚至有機會反彈至半年線9071點或季線9197點 酒店兼職。不過,從盤面可看出反市場操作盛行,幾乎很難用以往經驗分析,股市在大幅修正下,對於有量有價的股票較有機會,建議投資人選股可注意第4季營收較佳的族群,優先逢低承接。例如,第 酒店打工4季營收維持高峰的族群有晶圓代工的台積電(2330)、漢磊(5326),IC設計的揚智、IC通路的聯強(2347)、大聯大(3702),面板的友達(2409)、奇美電(3009),NB的仁寶(2324)、緯創(3231)等大型股,以 有巢氏房屋及傳產股的塑化、機電、橡膠等類股,第4季營收有機會維持高檔,可多留意。 布局低本益比跌深股 目前選股重於指數,保守的投資人,可選本益比低與股價超跌的族群逢低承接,積極的投資人則可考慮買進盤面主流股,但投資人 澎湖民宿須做好資金分配與控管,嚴格設定停損價位,至少先讓虧損減少,未來才有資金進場布局。吳文彬口述 李亮萱整理 .msgcontent .wsharing ul li { text-indent: 0; } 分享 Facebook Plurk YAHOO! 酒店兼職  .

en15enbaaa 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

          【五十年精選名店】實在的料理用心品嘗 北港小吃肉圓 小吃除了是台灣美食中最具特色的飲食文化之外,同時也是一個?廬山飯店a方的風情文化,更是許多國外遊客來到台灣必嚐的 廬山溫泉重點飲食之一,因為台灣小吃除了有多樣的烹調口感之外,有些小吃攤 花蓮旅遊背後還帶豐富的人情故事。 位於北港鎮上的北港葉家肉圓,是一間五十年 花蓮民宿的小吃老店,北港在地人所稱「大憨肉圓」指的就是該店創始者葉隨芳,目前葉家肉圓由葉隨 吉安民宿芳的大女兒所承接經營。老闆娘從過小畢業後,就隨父親製作肉圓,期間曾因外嫁夫家,中斷過一段時候,後來又繼續承接 花蓮住宿父親的事業直到今日。 肉圓要好吃外皮的製作相當重要,除了採用上等的甘藷粉之外,烹調的時間與內餡的製作,加上米醬的調和 花蓮民宿氣味…等都是要花相當的時間跟精神力,這也是手工製作的最大特色,為的就是要讓顧客吃到最好吃的肉圓。 「實在的料理,以及顧好客人的心」是老闆娘的經 酒店經紀營理念,雖然店面不大,但是四、五十年所累積出的口碑,除了在地的固定客群之外,連北港附近海口地區的民眾也都是店內的老顧客。縱使經營肉圓已經二十多年的老闆娘,每天還是都吃著自己 港式飲茶家的肉圓,一點也不會膩。 北港媽祖旅遊:http://651.travel-web.com.tw/ 大雲林旅遊網:http://yunlin.travel-web.com.tw/ 引用【大台灣旅遊網 TTNews 黃柏庸】 台北港式飲茶  .

en15enbaaa 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

          990428流行手機款式流行資訊: 這是99.04.28日,亮亮上網血拼,收集之人氣排行超前的流行手機 款式,報給水水及網友們一同分享: 全 開幕活動台第一支16:9可旋轉螢幕設計 3.2吋WVGAASV超大螢幕 內建320 賣房子萬畫素數位相機 3.6MbpsHSDPA傳輸 3.3吋AQUOS旋轉螢幕手機 520萬畫素相機 會場佈置 支援防窺螢幕設計 支援HSDPA最高至3.6Mbps 支援螢幕自動旋轉、手勢鎖定功能 採用TouchW 情趣用品iz觸控介面、支援Widget功能拖曳 支援320萬畫素CMOS相機 800萬畫素CCD相機 3吋AQUOS超細緻螢幕 支援3.5G高?商務中心t下載 S605.0觸控介面 內建32GB記憶體 支援AGPS/GPS/電子羅盤 500萬畫素卡爾蔡司相機 內建320萬像素相機 支援2.5倍數 房屋買賣碼變焦 立體聲雙喇叭 採用S605.0作業平台 320萬畫素相機 直覺式觸控設計 3.2吋超大螢幕 內建500萬畫素相機自動對焦 支援3G影像傳 網路行銷輸功能 支援藍牙無線傳輸2.0 支援MicroSD記憶卡擴充 810萬畫素自動對焦/氙氣閃光燈 臉部追蹤對焦偵測/防紅眼功能 內建HSDPA3.5G/Wifi高速下載 有興趣的 酒店工作水水及網友們都可以點擊圖文進去看喔! 註:1. 亮亮的服裝配飾,及各種流行時尚及人氣商品資訊,純屬個人覺得是不錯的資訊,po圖文推薦供眾水水及網友們一同分享,並非從事營利或 澎湖民宿網拍,特此聲明! 2.圖文如有侵權,請留言告知,以便刪除! 謝謝~~   .msgcontent .wsharing ul li { text-indent: 0; } 分享 Facebook Plurk YAHOO! 烤肉  .

en15enbaaa 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

          社交活動 用換工的方式旅遊, 不僅節省一筆可觀的旅費; 包括伙食、住宿、交通的費用。在社交方面更是因為有HOST的陪伴同遊, 讓我們也結交了許多好朋友, 遊玩一些平常不會到的地方, 真正進入當地的文化社會, 體驗他們的生活模式。 社交活動包括; Wwoofer的聯誼會, 參加讀書會慶祝春天, 參加藝術節的活動, 到教會去跳舞等。 Wwoofer的聯誼會 在紐西蘭有超過1000多家的HOST加入WWOOF組織, 而有些HOST的距離不遠, 所以互相有連絡, 聊聊W 酒店打工woofer的情況。 有一天我們就和HOST J到隔壁的農場去拜訪, 那天有Wwoofer剛抵達。 二位德國的Wwoofer很健談, 大家互相介紹家庭成員、從事的職業、國家的文化等, 感覺好像是Wwoofer的聯誼會, 很有意思。而從他們口中得知, 德國的wwoofer都是由旅行社代辦, 所以事先也不知道會碰到什麼樣的HOST。對於我們當Wwoofer這個計劃, 從一開始到來HOST這裡, 都是自己申請處理的, 他們感到很驚?租屋Y, 不可思議。 慶祝春天的到來 春天的到來, 是很令人歡喜的一件大事。 經過寒冷的冬天, 除了土地得到充分的休息, 人們也跟著氣候的變化稍作喘息。 所以, 春分是一個值得慶祝的日子。 許多地方都慶祝著春天的到來, 在HOST I這個小社區裡, 春分聚餐時, 每一家提供一道菜和大家一起分享。 飯後一起唱著歌, 氣氛很歡樂。 而HOST A 則是邀我們一起到遠處的親子讀書會去慶祝, 大約有4 個不同的親子讀書 面膜會人馬聚在一起, 很熱鬧。 我們從較遠的地方來, 到達朋友家時, 已經有許多從不同地方來的朋友了。雖然大部分都是第一次見面, 在A介紹完我們這一家人後, 就不再感到陌生了。長桌上擺放了各式各樣的鮮花和藤蔓, 每個人都正在製作自己的花環, 有些人已經將花環戴在頭上了。有趣的是, 爸爸們也都戴了五顏六色的花環, 而且一點都不覺得靦腆呢。 我們也趕緊加入製作花環的行列, 一邊聊天一邊創作, 氣氛非常輕鬆, 每個人都很好 酒肉朋友奇我們的來歷。原來, 這裡很多人都聽過我們這一家wwoofer了, 感覺很?馨。主持人很大方的提供她的家讓許多讀書會的朋友來, 所以這裡是某個讀書會的據點。 趕快加入製作花環的工作, 姐妹說; 好漂亮的花.   我們很漂亮吧 大家正在學製作花盆, 種花 每個人都製作了自己所要的花環後, 就把各自帶來的點心集合在庭院的長桌上。 接著主持人先帶大家唱有關春天的歌, 並說些祝福語。然後就開始喝茶、 房屋買賣聊天、吃點心。有一位美國女孩是用交換家庭的方式來紐西蘭旅遊, 對於交換家庭, 我們一直很有興趣, 不斷詢問她有關的事項。她建議我們可以加入交換家庭的組織, 也可以用這種方式旅遊, 聽起來也是一個好主意呢。 喝完茶, 所有人又移動到室內, 圍成一個圓圈。陸續有人帶動唱歌, 有人利用方巾玩親子遊戲, 有人帶手指謠, 說故事, 這樣的方式我們是十分熟悉的, 在台灣我們也組織親子讀書會, 活動內容很相似。有些歌我們也是熟悉的, 例如: five little monkey 宜蘭民宿s jumping on the bed, 小星星英文版…因為熟悉更容易融入。大家都很盡興的玩了一個早上, 然後又趕去參加另一個藝術節的活動。 芊芊有一個小粉絲, 一直跟著她. 唱手指謠 Nelson的藝術節是一個很大的藝術活動, 每年都會擁入許多人潮到這個小鎮來參與。 每年藝術節的第一天都以面具遊行作為開幕儀式, 遊行的隊伍有學校團體、有私人組團、 也有雙人或四人組成一團的隊伍。 HOST A也組團參加遊行, 在這天之前, 我們常到 票貼這附近的朋友家做道具, 大部分的材料都是從二手店或資源回收場採購來的。 A的朋友是一位藝術家, 經她設計的衣服道具, 每個大人小孩都打扮得很亮眼, 完全看不出來都是回收的材料。 雖然我們來不及參與她們的製作, 不過看到她們的遊行隊伍, 也感到與有榮焉. 出發前來個大合照, ? 到集合地點得走15分鐘 讓小孩坐在手推車上, 走累了就換人坐. 遊行時,孩子就不會走得哇哇叫了, 真是好主意. 歡樂的氣氛充滿整個Nelson, 而各式各樣的創意面具, 也讓人眼睛為之 澎湖民宿一亮。遊行隊伍一邊走一邊表演, 有的直接和觀眾互動。遊行結束後, 街上就開始有各種的表演活動; 現場樂團演奏, 我們一群人就在街頭跳舞, 有付費的摩天輪, 有街頭藝人的歌唱表演, 踩高蹺等等, 真的很熱鬧。 化好粧, 準備上場了. 看得出來他們打扮成什麼嗎? 樂隊都戴上了面具, 主辦單位發面具給兩旁的觀眾          好大的蝸牛           漂亮的天鵝    看我們精采的表演 星期一跳舞去   在HOST P這裡, 星期一是我的Happy Day。 我和P, J三位女 關鍵字排名生固定到Levin鎮上去跳舞, 是教會所辦的課程, 每人每次2 元。 這個課程已經開很久了, 是以跳country dance為主, 大約有30人, 大部分是阿公阿媽級。這個團體的人很親切, 常會有人主動來邀舞, 所以很快的和大家打成一片。 剛開始要進入這種舞蹈很難, 舞蹈中要一直更換舞伴, 除了不熟悉舞伴也因為需要轉來轉去的, 一個晚上真的頭都暈了。 雖然如此, 我發覺我喜歡上這種舞蹈了。有時會有較難的舞曲, 資深的同學也不敢嚐試, 而老師總是跟我說; Amy 你可以的, 我想我是一個認真的學生。最後一次跳完, 大家都來跟我道別, 感到有些?房地產ㄠ芊C  .

en15enbaaa 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

          回電時把『 +886 』刪掉吧! 回電時把『 +886 』刪掉吧! 手機號碼在接收別人的手機顯示時會變+8 宜蘭民宿86……  而非以前顯示的 0920 酒店經紀. 0935 ..... 經問台灣大哥大公司才知道... 因 婚禮顧問他們陸續更新機地台線路後會把顯示號碼改以 +886 …… 顯示 以因 關鍵字廣告應國際化云云…… 根據底下這封信,才知他們可以 把原來網內互打 的優惠價都賺?辦公室出租^來了... 所以,當你收到別人的號碼為 +886 …… 請記得刪掉 +886 改以 09…… 去儲存喔! 襯衫回電時把『 +886 』刪掉吧! 各位是不是有時收到簡訊或未接來電, 對方所出現 的數字是 +886 xxxxxxxxx 這時候要 西裝注意囉! 如果直接回撥或儲存這樣的號碼時,會用網外的方 式計費,不管是打網內還是網外喔! 就算後面的號碼是同家的門號,也一 酒店兼職樣用網外的方 式計費! 變相加收費用喔! 打去客服問過了,他們說只要有 + 886 都會 跳國際 線路 出去變成網外,通過的線路是不一樣的, 不要 燒烤 讓自己的錢,繳得莫名其妙喔!   .msgcontent .wsharing ul li { text-indent: 0; } 分享 Facebook Plurk YAHOO! 襯衫  .

en15enbaaa 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

          對業與輪迴的誤解 佛教徒相信業、相信輪迴,但對它們有誤解。 (一)有些人認為佛教的業與輪迴,是釋迦牟尼佛從印度教的修行者那兒學習來的,而事實上並不是。業與輪迴是世間的真理, 591因為印度的一些外道先發現,他們演說出來,而釋迦牟尼佛是一位覺者,自覺覺他,覺行圓滿,覺悟這世間的真理,他所講演的佛 室內裝潢法也必定符合真理,外道把這業與輪迴先講演出來,佛陀也闡釋業與輪迴的道理,但這並不等於釋迦牟尼佛所講的業與輪迴是向外道學習的。 G2000 (二)釋迦牟尼佛詮釋的業與輪迴與外道所講的不一樣。佛教認為業與輪迴是無作者、無受者、沒有主宰,佛陀說諸法無我,故無造業與受業者。印度外道發現業 褐藻醣膠與輪迴的存在,但是卻找不出原因,所以認為業與輪迴有一個主宰者∣∣大梵天。而佛教認為業與輪迴沒有主宰,這只是世間自然的法則,以佛法來講,即是「法爾如是」。 (三 21世紀房屋仲介)業與輪迴是假有的幻相,我們相信業與輪迴,但千萬別把它當作是實有,它是假有,因緣幻化而有,不實在的。這個業非常,非獨立存在。「業非常」之意即是:有些人認為在百千萬劫以前造一個業因 酒店打工,它可以儲存不變,留到今世才受報,這就是「常見」。如果一個東西「常」,它就不會再變化,故業非常。「業本身不是獨立存在的」,此話之意即是:我們造了一個業,它並不是獨立形成的,是眾多的東西配合成的?房屋出租A即是我們造業時,並非只造一個業,而是同時造很多業。這些業之間互相為因緣和合而生成。所謂因緣和合,即是一個東西,並非由單獨一個東西生起,而是由很多東西互相配合而形成的。業也是如此,既然是因緣和合,它不是單一的, 好房網不是獨立一個存在的,它是由很多東西互相影響,因緣和合而形成的。比如,我們做了一個偷盜的業,人們往往會認為它是單一的行為表現,但是事實並非如此,它是貪心、有惡朋友、或是沒福報,需要它,但又得不到,而造成要偷盜。業是不能斷滅的?長灘島A它一直向前延續,與不同的外緣作用,就有不同的轉變。當它轉變形成了果報,我們就要受報;它不形成果報,咱們就無需承受了。 .msgcontent .wsharing ul li { text-indent: 0; } 分享 Facebook Plurk YAHOO! 租屋  .

en15enbaaa 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

          《碎碎唸》我最近的最愛.... 暨今年生日從日本空運來的第一條????????相機背帶和第二條9月日雜自己動手DIY的ZAKKA相機?裝潢I帶 後, 上個月的某天,下班順道繞到木布屋看看新 酒店工作的布品會給我帶來什麼靈感,當天看著一整排的緞帶,突然,靈感悄悄上門 辦公室出租,敗了一些不同花色的棉麻蕾絲回家,棉麻一直是我的最愛,我喜歡他那自然、濃厚的日雜?辦公室出租A他有一種魔力總是讓人覺得很舒服, 在櫃上還發現一些手作小物的配飾單品不小心手滑也一併帶回家了 住商房屋,超可愛... 有別於第一次初體驗做的單調花樣,這回我將賦予這條專屬背帶一點女人味,我想將這三款不同花色尺寸的日本 酒店經紀棉麻蕾絲組成一朵耀眼的日式小花, 第二回自己手作比較有經驗,不僅質感提昇了一階,款式經過改良也時尚多了,這朵蕾絲花更是有十足加分 禮服效果,下擺刻意縫上幾條自然垂墜的蕾絲緞帶,花蕊則由白色珍珠取代增添質感,這樣是不是夠時尚、夠日系甜美呢! 另外,這背帶也是送人的好選擇,目前除了老公 賣屋外,一條上回送給同年同月同日的拉小寶,另一條則是送給"正妹"囉! 誰說相機背帶只能是原廠黑嘛嘛的製式背帶呢!他也可以是我們服裝的配件之一,換新裝後的新夥伴,將開始背 借貸負起陪伴我旅遊紀錄的重責, 以下照片皆為這回台中行AKI 掌鏡的部份,掛在脖子上的背帶有沒有閃耀到能吸引路人的目光啊! 延伸閱讀 ????????相機背帶 自己動手DIY的ZAKKA相 租屋機背帶  .

en15enbaaa 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

          記者招待會-旅日華人藝術家~天涯白雲 秦生書畫展 168【一路發】電子報:http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/fly168-168 記者招待會-旅日華人藝術家~天涯白雲 秦生書畫展 旅日華人藝術家~天涯白雲 秦 廬山飯店生書畫展 ◎記者招待會:97年8月21日(四)上午10:00 ◎揭幕茶會:97年8月24日(日)上午10:00 ◎地點:文化中心一樓畫廊 ◎ 展 廬山溫泉期:97年8月21日(四)~9月28日(日) ◎ 地點:文化中心1F畫廊 ※ 休館時間:每週一全天、週二上午;中秋節<9月14日(日)> 琴畫綿綿‧赤壁懷古書畫民?花蓮旅遊琤磎T樂-南瀛民族樂團 ◎ 演出時間:97年8月24日(日) 晚上19:30 ◎ 演出地點:文化中心音樂廳 1、主辦單位:臺南縣政府 2、承辦單位:臺南縣政府文化處 花蓮民宿 3、協辦單位:財團法人臺南縣文化基金會、南瀛民族樂團 ※ 秦生老師會與南瀛民族樂團現場演奏合吟並揮毫創作!! 歡迎各位媒體記者朋友 撥冗前往參觀採訪指教 旅日華人藝術家秦 吉安民宿生,本名夏朝忱,1946年出生於中國陝西,由於歷經戰亂、文革,命運坎坷,漂流四方,自號「天涯白雲」。畢業於中國藝術研究院,曾獲得多項獎項,包括2000年世界華人藝術展金賞與銀賞;於日本九 花蓮住宿州成立日中水墨畫研究會,能書畫,能歌、能演。 秦生從小即擁有藝術天份,3歲即展露戲劇長才,加入青島話劇團演出,5歲時便能登台演唱民歌,10歲時美術作品即被青島日報選用刊登,期間還參與話劇演出,17歲發表第一部小 花蓮民宿說,他還擅長作曲,26歲在文革期間入獄,仍創作不輟。33歲是秦生藝術生命的轉捩點,因為受到打壓,無法登台演戲,於是下定決定咬牙學畫,1979年開始向工筆畫家王鳳年拜師學藝,入室25天,閉門謝客苦練達八個月之久,以超出常人的毅力和悟?酒店經紀吽A終於繪畫有成。人物、山水、花鳥等都有獨特的風格,特別在人物畫方面,更是獨樹一幟,筆下所描繪的,大多是美好的女性,線條優美流暢、設色淡雅。 1989年南瀛民族樂團楊正安老師與秦生因緣際會義結金蘭,今年秦生將與南瀛民族樂團共同演出,不僅是音樂演奏?港式飲茶M歌唱,還要加上書法、繪畫、朗誦表演,將以上各種形式融貫,在一首完美的民族交響樂中,整個音樂演唱過程中完成個人用心表達的一件巨幅美術作品。 .msgcontent .wsharing ul li { text-indent: 0; } 分享 Facebook Plurk YAHOO! 台北港式飲茶  .

en15enbaaa 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

          美食檔案》三坪魔法糕點房 咖啡族傾心難忘 更新日期:2010/11/18 03:52 陳璐璐  住家離公館不遠,因此頗熱愛其周邊小食。像是已歇業的水晶餃跟蛋黃肉包,還有昔日市場滋味很美的酸菜鴨肉 支票貼現米粉。結果上週發現新開快炒店有此菜單,就姑且拿來充作午餐。孰料入口豬油腥氣駭人,酸菜也若嚼臘。想來飲食如知己,人生難 房屋買賣逢。不能常去「交關」,又豈能怨物換星移呢?  而食罷逛了半晌,慶幸大致上沒變動的,就是靠近校園書房那條巷子。晚上有超好吃的臭豆腐,也有麵?太平洋房屋漱熁壎面`,餃子卻很出色的大史。再來便是璐璐的摯愛-開業超過二十年的點來鮮饅頭專賣店。  話說這兒,從前總誤以為他的門面很小,食物可能是工廠做好再上架 租辦公室的。但花了一番功夫詢問到店主後,才知道所有的蛋糕、餅乾、饅頭、飲品,竟全在小小約三坪的空間完成。難怪他會笑道:「啊?我不自己做,誰做?任何師傅看到這裡,都會搖頭不幹 有巢氏房屋的!」  原來念食品的蘇老闆,因為在當兵時認識了幾位好友,所以先是習得了調配豆子、跟煮咖啡的好本領。後來,因緣際會租下這塊三角窗,才更深入發掘起各項商品組合的獨特性。  所以,這些年 當鋪來,除了鮮奶饅頭之外,其他巧克力、花生、芝麻、檸檬乳酪、海苔肉鬆等,也是熱門商品。而且,不只麵皮組織鬆柔清爽,其餡料滋味的組合,真的好到沒話說。  像是璐璐最愛吃的芝麻、花生口味,就是獨門的配方 房地產,從原料就很講究,並非工廠罐裝貨。再經多次實驗後,才有現在香滑芳醇、餘味繞樑的質感。  還有多達十四層的千層蛋糕,嚐來馥郁高華、濕度適中。連老闆娘都要搖頭說:「廚房這麼熱,你真的有必要這樣做,賣別的不行嗎?」更別 小額信貸提,這兒的葡萄奶酥,因為夾心的安佳奶油經特別處理,搭配起來格外香。害我每次只敢買一片,怕失去自制,就要吃個不停呢!  除此之外,值得誇讚的還有特調咖啡,雖然一杯才35元,風味卻遠勝於價錢,更贏過部分連鎖店。因此路過時,雖然買些點心?seoB饅頭儲著很重要,但現場喝杯咖啡,才是「無法擋」的享受!(點來鮮饅頭專賣店,台北市羅斯福路四段24巷10號,台大門口正對面巷內) .msgcontent .wsharing ul li { text-indent: 0; } 分享 Facebook Plurk YAHOO! 房屋貸款  .

en15enbaaa 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

          女人更喜歡會“調情”的男人                 “男人不壞,女人不愛”幾乎已經成為一句俗語了。但男人們就是弄不懂,為什麼自己整天努力工作賺錢給?商務中心o花,她就是對那些有點“壞”的男人青睞有加。 這其中的問題主要出在男人身上,他們往往只想著去 禮服滿足女人的物質追求,而忽略了精神需要。女人們會喜歡的男人那種所謂的‘壞’,其實就是一種情趣。一個男人長期不定時 宜蘭民宿的外出洽公,每每回家後,夫妻倆都急不可待地享受“魚水之歡”。以前,兩人性生活都是直來直去,但妻子發現男人每次回來都多了許多前 房屋買賣戲,且開始會調情了。雖然,妻子心想男人學“壞”了,但身體上卻感到前所未有的刺激。人的本性是一樣的,都喜歡新鮮,喜歡變化。但中國男人往往很保守, 辦公室出租壓抑著自己的情感不去表達。女人們喜歡男人的“壞”,喜歡男人多一些情趣和花樣,只是嘴上不說而已;而男人往往被女人這種表現所蒙蔽,或者也受傳統思想的束縛,不願 租房子意,或者也不會與女人調情。長此以往,便造成了男人“好”,女人也不愛。當然,女人喜歡的“壞”並不僅僅是在性生活上。某電視劇中的一個情節很有代表性。妻子過生日,丈夫送了她一枚戒指 設計裝潢。女人抱怨道:“我的首飾夠多了,為什麼還要買這些東西。看看我朋友過生日的時候,丈夫送她999朵玫瑰,多浪漫。但丈夫卻認為戒指更實惠。這種男人往往犯了一個錯誤,他們認為女人要什麼給她們買 結婚什麼就行了。其實,即使是收入並不豐厚的家庭,女性也往往會對自己喜歡的小禮物例如玫瑰驚喜不已,更不必說家庭物質需求已經得到滿足的家庭了,“戒指”這樣的“實惠”物品顯然更無法引起女人的興奮,她們需要的是一些在 房屋貸款精神上給她們帶來滿足的東西。有些男人之所以受人青睞,是因為他們知道怎麼去挑起女人的興奮。這樣的男人有時會讓女人嬌顏微嗔、哭笑不得,但他們隨後也會讓女人破涕為笑、心花怒放。女人對這樣的男人說“你真壞”,實際上心裏卻暗自欣 設計裝潢喜。  .

en15enbaaa 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

          上班族要如何提升自己為知識? 上班族要如何提升自己為知識? 第一,不做知識懶蟲  投資自己,提高自己的附加價值,培養自己不論處於什麼情況下,都能存活的本領。你可以在上班時間動腦筋思考改進自己的工作,或者利用下班 G2000休息時間充電學習。我認為從三十五歲到五十歲是「魔鬼的十五年」,因為三十五歲的人大多進入公司有十年的年資,工作熟練之後,就不求知識上長進,只會汲汲於人 西服際關係,自我發展停頓,進入魔鬼的十五年。 第二,不要給自己設限,特別是公司的「職務規定」,有害於培養知識白領 公司許多成文或不成文的規定,都不相信員工,把員工當小孩?酒肉朋友l看待。例如出差費用定得死死的,啤酒、小菜都不能報帳,但如果報帳的員工判斷這些花費,對公司有貢獻,企業應該相信員工,授權決定。三年前,我在日立待的單位,一個月電話費上限是一萬日圓, 酒店工作打完電話還要在規定的筆記本上,記入打的對方和時間。還記得有天下午,我在公司後院散步,總務部的人要我回座位。「為什麼?」我問。「現在是上班時間,」總務部的人回答。「我在設計上有想不通的地方,想在 酒店打工清靜的地方,思考一下,」我說明。「不行,請你在位子上思考,」總務部的人一臉不悅。我一直認為,以遵循公司規定為最高準則的人,如何能在未來創造新的規則?只會鑽營、想辦法升遷的人,怎能站上無國界競爭的世界舞台? 第三,不 室內設計要怕犯錯,要有勇氣重新開始 沒有失敗過的人和企業,想法僵硬,我認為三十歲前應該失敗三次以上。但大多數的年輕人,都被我們的教育體系教導成害怕失敗、避免失敗。而且很多人,不能否定自我,怕因此失去既有的一切,但如果沒有否定自我的勇氣 吳哥窟,個人、企業和國家都失去創新的能力。看看電腦語言,二十五年變了五回,家電產品的功能更是一代超越一代。這些進步都是從否定推翻出發,經營手法又何嘗不是。我還有一個經驗,不要想「很可惜」,而要有隨時都重頭來的勇氣,想到可惜,人生就失敗了一半。 西裝外套如果當時我答應留在日立,就不會到麥肯錫發展。五十歲時,我退出麥肯錫,稍後參選議員和東京都長,後來決定從此不參與政治活動,都沒有一絲「可惜」的心裡。年輕人更可以重頭來,但決定的時候需要拿得起放得下的勇氣,不能留後路,要有破釜沈舟的決心。 第四,不挑工作我在麥肯?西裝外套搮L幾千人,成功和不成功的人有一個清楚的差別,成功的人不論什麼工作都不挑。不討厭、不選擇工作,不論什麼工作都積極地站在顧客立場思考,從中一定可以學習成長。 .msgcontent .wsharing ul li { text-indent: 0; } 分享 Facebook Plurk YAHOO! 澎湖民宿  .

en15enbaaa 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()